저위험 투자와 고위험 투자: 무엇이 다른가?

Threat is considered a basic condition in investing; no consideration of profitability or performance has any value in the absence of at least some mention of risk. But for the purpose of young traders the question is this, to realize where the risk actually resides and in comparison to the difference between low and high risk.

Taking into account the degree to which risk is considered basic for the purpose of investment, numerous young investors believe that this is a completely concrete and quantifiable concept. Unfortunately, this is in no way the case. No matter how amazing it may sound, however, up to these times there is no real agreement on what “risk” means and how it should be defined.

Experts often try to apply variability as an indirect indicator of risk. At a specific level this is absolutely reasonable. Variability is the degree to which the indicator is very capable of changing over time. Compared to a wider range of abilities, along with the possibility that many of them will fall bad. In addition, the variability is relatively easy to measure.

Unfortunately, variability as a measure of risk is imperfect. Although it is true that the most volatile stocks or bonds expose their owner to the widest range of possible outcomes, this does not necessarily affect the possibility of such outcomes. In many relationships, volatility is more similar to disorder, together with what meets a traveler in an airplane - perhaps, unpleasant, but has no special relationship to the likelihood of a crash.

It is more correct in general to think about the risk as well as the ability or probability of a stable loss of the price of the asset or the extraction of results beyond the predicted. If a depositor acquires assets hoping for profitability of 10%, the possibility that the return will go beyond 10% is a threat to this investment. This also means that low performance in comparison with the index is not necessarily considered a risk. If an investor buys an asset expecting that some will return 7% and some will return 8%, the fact that the S&P 500 has returned to 10% does not matter on any significant level.

Main conclusions

• There are no perfect definitions or measurements of risk.
• For inexperienced traders it is more correct to think about risk from the point of view of the probability that this investment (or portfolio of investments) will not reach the expected profitability, and the amount in which it is able to not reach this goal.
• Understanding more correctly what such risk is and where someone is able to take, traders can function to form a portfolio, which in no way only has the lowest possibility of loss, but also the minimum maximum loss potential.

Every investment involves a certain degree of risk, with many of them being significantly riskier than others. Capital investments together with a high degree of risk have all the chances to be attractive, offering a large possible profit as a fee because of your dangerous investments.

The increased degree of risk does not mean that dangerous investments should be avoided - “risky” is not necessarily the same as “bad”. However, you must be prone to this, that the acceptable finale is able to be a loss in general, that you have invested.

Just like a serious investor, you must find a period to realize the dangers of investing and find a solution. There is a unit where you hunger to eat together with low risk or to eat together with high risk.

High-risk investments are often more volatile by nature. In certain cases, investments may not have any regulatory protection, such as certain digital assets. You should also consider to what extent you are comfortable to say goodbye to your funds on a permanent basis. Investments with a high degree of risk have the lowest degree of liquidity, which means that once your funds are invested in an investment, it will be difficult to acquire them if you change your mind.

High stakes make dangerous investments the most optimal for the purpose of experienced investors, in such a case the period as well as those who are just starting their own approach in investing, have all chances to choose investment alternatives with low risk to begin with.

All investments, without exception, involve a certain risk - but this is a scale, and many of them have a higher risk than others. One or another no matter how decisive the situation looks, it is important to take the time to realize the risk, in order to make sure that any investment is suitable for you.

At the lower end of the scale there are investments similar in money means, such as currency trading means, bonds and some others.

Another component that gives a sense of security of investments together with a low degree of risk is their large high liquidity. This means that your investments together with the least possibility to suffer from short-term changes in value, and you can more easily withdraw your own money, in case you change your mind.

Investments together with a low degree of risk deliver less income compared to investments together with a high level of risk, usually for the longest period of time. However, patience pays off. It is quite possible that a constant and stable portfolio of low-risk investments can bring you a greater return than a high-risk portfolio over the same period of time due to low volatility and a gradual increase in returns.

Example

Let's look at a few examples to explain the difference between high-risk and low-risk investments.

Biotech stocks are sadly notoriously risky. A deterrent majority of new empirical medicines endure failure, and, unsurprisingly, most promotions of biotech companies besides end up enduring failure. In a similar way, there is both a large proportion of probability of failure (most of them will fail), as well as a huge size of potential failure.

In comparison, US Treasury bonds have a completely different risk profile. The possibility that a depositor holding a treasury bond will in no way acquire the announced profit and key payments is almost non-existent. Including in case there are suspensions together with payments (extremely rare in the United States events), traders, or rather in general, will return a significant part of the invested funds.

It is also important to consider the impact of diversification in the threat of an investment portfolio. In full, dividend-paying promotions of major Fortune 100 companies are not dangerous, and investors have every chance to rely on the acquisition of medium- and profitable specific indicators for many years.

At the same time, however, there is always the threat that an individual company will fail. Such firms, as well as Eastman Kodak and Woolworths, are considered popular examples of one-time situations of success, which in the end suffered failure. In addition, market volatility is always likely.

If the investor keeps all his own funds in one stock without exception, the possibility that bad things will happen is relatively low, but the possible severity of the results is quite high. But in the case of holding a portfolio with 10 such shares, in this case not only the risk of insufficient activity of the portfolio is reduced, but also reduces the size of possible damage to the entire portfolio.

Investors must be inclined to evaluate risk in a complex and flexible way. For example, diversification is an essential component of risk. Holding a portfolio of investments, which all without exception have an insignificant threat, but all without exception have an identical threat, can be quite unsafe. For example, even though the possibility of a single airplane crash is very small, numerous large airlines have all without exception also suffered (or will suffer) a crash. Holding a portfolio of treasury bonds together with a low degree of risk may seem like a very low-risk investment, but all of them without exception have similar dangers; the arrival of a very nearly impossible action (for example, a default of the U.S. government) will be devastating.

Investors are also obliged to take into account such conditions as short-term horizon, projected profitability and knowledge if they consider risk. In full, compared to longer the investor is able to expect, along with the more possibility of this, that someone will acquire the projected return. Undoubtedly, there is a specific interdependence between risk and profitability, and investors expecting higher returns must realize a significantly higher risk of not receiving a profit. Knowledge is also important - not only to establish such investments, which together with the maximum possibility will bring the expected profit (or even better), but also to establish the probability and extent of this, what can go wrong.

Investing is very rarely joined to this, in order to hit the jackpot. It's all about the long-term game, balancing growth and sustainability to create a steady stream of passive income. By combining high-risk investments, such as digital assets or growth promotions, with low-risk investments, such as loan capital, REITs and P2P loans, you will form a bag that will grow in different market conditions.

The attraction of equilibrium is that it gives you the best of both worlds: the excitement of chasing growth and the convenience of steady income. Regardless of whether you are a young, ambitious professional, a thrifty person halfway through a promotion or a retiree seeking peace of mind, the right mix of assets can help you achieve your economic goals without undue stress.

Your portfolio should reflect your risk tolerance, current period and long-term aspirations. Devices like robo-advisors, allocation trackers and P2P lending platforms can make it easier to create and maintain a balanced strategy.

So, create the first step. Assess your goals, analyze current investments and write down adjustments to achieve the required balance. Your future «me» - a passive income vacationer - will be grateful to you.

‍